Keep checking the CAA site for close encounters of the fixed wing type.......
There were probably miles apart but as there is no other visual reference to provide scale it looks closer that it probably is.
Airprox is the term.
Extract from the document..........
Second para is the 'interesting' one
There are, nevertheless, occasions when other individuals
believe they have witnessed ‘a near miss’ and wish to report
the incident. In such circumstances it invariably proves to be
the case that aircraft on apparently conflicting tracks were
separated vertically, ie they were at different heights.
Indeed, vertical separation is fundamental to air traffic
systems worldwide. Even to the expert eye, judging the
relative height of 2 or more aircraft can be extremely difficult,
especially if the higher aircraft is larger than the other.
In the UK, at all levels and even in the worst weather
conditions, air traffic controllers can cross aircraft 1000 feet
above or below each other. In good weather, in areas where
an air traffic control service is not mandatory, pilots can
significantly reduce this 1000 feet vertical separation and still
operate with complete safety on a ‘see and avoid’ basis.http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/7/Dap%20sheet%2010.pdf
Proud parent of Tom.com & King Willy.
Chairman of 309 (Sawbridgeworth) Sqn Association Committee RAFAC
West Sector Chairperson Essex Wing RAFAC
Owner of Stanley Schnauzer.... and Alfie Cockerpoo